ads

Society needs a few changes made. We must remind the world that women are infact the majority, and men are the minority. We, the smartest, the best and brightest, must stop feeling guilty, and stop letting the media fool us into thinking that we are less than what we really are. We are stronger than women for a reason. We are smarter than women for a reason. We are mammals, not insects. Mammals have alpha males, we do not have Queens.

We shouldn't go quite as far as the middle east, and make the women the lowest of low (Remember that most women are in fact smarter than most men) but we must not allow them to think of themselves as the highest of high! Women are the in between.

A social caste should be instated. Probably the easiest way to divide the castes is by IQ. I am well aware that IQ is a useless concept, but you cannot deny the fact that those with an IQ of 180 are USUALLY SMARTER than those with an IQ of 100. There are already tons and tons of ways to calculate one's IQ, and it would be simpler than devising another test entirely. Social Caste system that is entirely based upon intelligence, with the dumbest as laborers, the smartest as supervisors, and the elite, as just that, the elite.

It would be beautiful.

/b/ I ask you to help make Anonymous' dream a reality.

interesting

niggerballs

ANONYMOUS IS NOT YOUR PERSONAL ARMY!!!!

Your fortune: Excellent Luck

take out the gender issues and what do you have?

Plato. Go read the Republic.

>>43817746
Lrn2IQ. Doesn't actually go to 180.

>>43818119
You're an idiot. Any distribution goes to infinity. Certain tests (like the WAIS-III) just aren't able to distinguish above a certain threshold.

HAY /b/
SUPRISE SEX
MYspace:
myspace.com/xxprincess4lyfxx

email:
[email protected]
pass:
annon23
you know what to do,
GO GO GO

>>43818190
Which is my point. Any score that hits 180 can't be trusted as anything but a random fluke.

Your fortune: Reply hazy, try again

this copypasta is bland and unsatisfying

>>43818119

GTFO newfag. You may be going by one particular test that only goes up to 150, but it's just that one particular test.

The elite included Ben Franklin, 160; Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, 165; Immanuel Kant and Julius Caesar, 175; René Descartes, 180; and Galileo Galilei and Leonardo da Vinci, 185. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe with a score of 210.

To date, William James Sidis has the highest IQ of all time. He was so smart that he could learn an entire language in only one day. His IQ was so high that it was immeasurable (somewhere between 250 - 300).

After a certain point, IQs are hardly measurable, but AT that point, I think it's pretty safe to say that they get into the "elite" as the OP put it.

I really don't think an aristocracy is a good way to go... it becomes a bit too incestuous if you try and keep it up within the castes

It doesn't seem to be based on blood. Granted two smart parents will probably end up making a smart kid, but smart children will pop out of the poor and dumb caste, inevitably. Once they're "Tested" they'd be moved up into the smart group, with all the other smart-fags.

But therein lies the problem. Unless you can find a way to test babies before their parents have a chance to talk to them, those smart kids from the stupid castes will definitely have sympathy and compassion for the poor.

Letting a person that speaks for the people be in a place where his voice can be heard is dangerous.

>>43817715
Bitches dont know bout Brave New World

>"The Glass Ceiling" phenomenon is not because men are sexist, and will not allow women to have a seat of power, but because the smartest men are without sexism entirely, and only give the best jobs to the people that are actually capable of doing the best job.

LOLWUT

What would you do about autistic people with incredibly high IQ, but horrible actual intelligence? I figure you haven't thought of that yet, have you?

>>43819714

Use them as organic computers. Duh.

I have never met a truly intelligent women except for my older sister. All other women make decisions on impulse, or based completely on emotion without thinking about strategy, or they just randomly select their decisions. I have met a large number of truly intelligent men. What the media doesn't show is that men have been smart enough to create empires and armies. There has never once been a historically documented case of a women creating and/or maintaining a civilization and/or military, besides the magical feminine Amazonians, which we have no evidence of ever existing. Girl power does not exist.

"We are mammals, not insects. Mammals have alpha males, we do not have Queens."

WIN

gb2 the kitchen

>>43819949

Well there's Joan of Arc, but I'm pretty sure that she was a trap.

Female Hyenas have pseudo PENISes so they can't be inseminated unless they want it. discuss.

>>43819949
learn your social history.

>>43820419

They developed PENISes because the males really sucked ass.

>>43817893

Noone is /r/ an army faggot.

>>43820084
My new motto. Fuck you feminazis.

>>43820351
She heard voices in her head and she was given the chance to deny that this voice was god, she knowingly did not and she was burned at the stake.

>>43820419
Superior.
>>43819528
Thank you, someone in this thread is fucking intelligent.
>>43819265
Although I disagree with OP, how could you make a smart child if women are the median in this person's mind? You'd need a super intelligent man and a super intelligent women, and according to him, none such woman exists.
>>43819949
Women can maintain a civilization. The reason they do not want to maintain an army is because they've realized that war is worth nothing and only causes harm. Sure, there's a use for them... "preparation", but the fact is war is pretty pointless, other than having something to bitch about.

>>43820735

GB2/Kitchen!!

...slut.

>>43820877
...right.

>>43820735

"Although I disagree with OP, how could you make a smart child if women are the median in this person's mind?"

Because high intelligence can result through random genetic mutation or recessive genes suddenly coming through. Learn your genetics.

>>43820902
I've learned my genetics. I doubt they'd be willing to take a chance on recessive genes coming through.
The correct answer is upper caste males remember the human genome, map it out completely, and make the recessive gene dominant by genetically engineering it.
So STFU AND GTFO.

>>43821047

Why would you suddenly start discussing the mapping of the human genome and genetic modification when just a moment ago you were asking a simple question about how an intelligent man could result from a less intelligent woman? Despite the fact that you're an idiot, I'm going to debate you anyway out of boredom.

Until we successfully map the human genome, we do what? You're talking about the future, I'm talking about now. Recessive genes and mutations would occur on occasion, and the upper caste of males would deal with it in a way they saw fit. You can't just go off on a tangent and claim I'm wrong simply because I'm not willing to rely on methods that can't even be used yet. That's feminine logic.

I'm a girl (I'm quite smart, but very scatterbrained alot of the time) and I agree with what you're saying. (in b4 no girls on teh internets)
I see stupid bitches walking around all day talking about people who are talking about people and it's just bullshit. I prefer to hang out with guys. Why? they have better senses of humor, more knowledge (one of them in particular is a walking fucking wikipedia) and more on their mind than where to buy the best moisturizer or go shopping. They accept me as one of them, but still pay me out cause I'm a chick. you know what? whenever they do, I agree with them. because I think they're right, in a way.

OPs graph is retarded. If his statement is true, then the graph would really look like this Gaussian distribution graph

>>43821332
How an intelligent man could result from a less intelligent woman? I was talking about a child in general. What they said was contradictory, I asked to show that they made a mistake in what they said.
That's great that you were talking about now, really, that's fantastic. Almost of this topic is hopes, dreams, and what if's. Usually that means pertaining to the future.
You won't rely on methods that haven't been used yet. But none of this has happened either. This is all hypothetical, correct? Then obviously me talking about the mapping of the human genomes and genetic engineering is hypothetical too. Yes, they want to do it and it will most likely happen some time in the near future, but it's not happening. Like I said, hypothetical; a dream.

>>43821439
sorry, you've lost now, you had a hope, but then you made this comment. Run away now.

>"The Glass Ceiling" phenomenon is not because men are sexist, and will not allow women to have a seat of power, but because the smartest men are without sexism entirely, and only give the best jobs to the people that are actually capable of doing the best job.

positions of power are often not occupied by 'very smart' people. then again, i'm all for keeping the womenz int he kitchenz

There would have to be some other method, or another test to use with a standard, expanded I.Q. test.
It is not perfect, and it is not hugely accurate.
A high functioning autist is certainly a lot less intelligent than I, even if they can calculate square roots of four digit numbers in their heads. (I use as an example, my cousin.)
A person without social skills cannot be an alpha-male. One who cannot weave the threads of interpersonal relationships is a cripple in a society such as this.

Sexual relationships would be changed immensely. The Alpha Males could near take their pick of the lower caste females, the females consenting, as producing an intelligent child could have blowback effects on her.
For sexual release, the center-administrator class would take attractive partners from the 'art' or 'labourer' classes with no stigma. Or practice rampant lesbianism.

>>43821439
Finally a bitch that knows her place.

Your fortune: Bad Luck

The graph in the OP suggests (a)that there are more men than women in the world overall, or the male bars are to a different scale than the female ones and (b)that most people fall under the category of "very smart".

LOL U GUISE I DON'T THINK THIS IS WHOLLY SCIENTIFIC.

Your fortune: You will meet a dark handsome stranger

ITT: We talk about teh intelligense.

>>43821746

somebody already addressed that in this post>>43821509

There is simply more variation among males than among females. Men are more susceptible to mental illness and mental retardation, but are at the same time more prone to genius. In fact, over 90% of the world's geniuses are men. Species in which females are more prone to variation, and thus more prone to retardation, deformity, etc. have less stable population and thus die off.

I don't necessarily agree that women are on average smarter than men. I will simply agree that the majority of people of both genders are pretty dumb. "Average" ain't that smart.

Sure, the bottom 10% of men are dumber than the bottom 10% of women, but the top 30% of men are on the whole much smarter than the top 30% of women.

amidoinitrite?

>>43821887
You know, women hear all of these facts, and I for one can accept it, but I think I can say for every woman who is not a total idiot that we just don't like hear it, and let it get rubbed in our faces.
Intelligent girls can take the blow and agree with you, we just don't like to be reminded of it constantly. That's where you get the angry intelligent girl. They just get annoyed with it constantly be repeated and rubbed in our noses.

We can take the truth... just quiet down your victory.

>>43817746

Good luck with that. I don't think it can happen in the current society setup. Look at asia where women are still OWNED.

There is certainly bigger fish to fry. How about people try not being so stupid all of the time? That would make me so happy. Get the fuck off your cellphones while driving. Stop thinking you need some stuff when you don't. Actually go and get an education.

Again, not gonna happen. ahh well,it was fun while it lasted.

Your fortune: Bad Luck

>>43817715
OP, I take offense. I am a sexy, young, brilliant young woman and I am a fellow anon on /b/. Why must you hate that which you don't understand?

>>43822007
You should come to just deal with it, like men have dealt with commercials over the years. Ever noticed that mom is always smarter than dad? Is that fair?

The big secret about feminism is that it's not the doing of women; it's the doing of men. After World War II it became apparent that a society in which women hold down (low-level) jobs is more competetive than one in which women stay home. Note that it's Rosie the Riveter, not Rosie the corporate executive.

We men can afford to have an even playing field with women, because our elite will outcompete their elite. There are few female executives because there are relatively few women fit for executive jobs. Meanwhile, we see many female cashiers because it ain't that hard to learn how to work a till. The majority of women weren't emancipated so much as duped into doing grunt work.

show me a woman that can change the oil in a car.

>>43822056
They don't want to understand us, that's the thing. They just want to get on with their lives with as little confrontation as possible. And that is generally healthy and intelligent.

>>43822056
fake, lies, prostitute.

>>43822056

OP here. I understand perfectly. You're either lying, or stupid.

Your fortune: Good news will come to you by mail

>>43822148
Fuck you loser. Enjoy ur virginity. U wish you could handle my intellect and my sweet tits.

>>43822223

I wish "U" could type correctly.

>>43822223
I don't trust anyone who says they're intelligent and knows she needs to at least try to show it on the internet, and can't even fucking spell out the word, "U".
Just, get out. You're a failure to my gender.

>>43822007
Oh, I don't mean to rub it in your face. I feel free to say it on these forums because they're pretty much a "no girls allowed" zone.

>>43822223
Damn, she's right... she is pretty hot...

>>43822304
Well as long as you're not as upfront in real life, congratulations on not getting any confrontation for an intelligent woman. Only the stupid ones.

graph fails so fucking hard.

>>43822365
Damn, I meant from an intelligent woman. Sorry.

>>43822365
The intelligent ones know to avoid confrontations.

>>43822365
I relish the occasion... unfortunately, you're few and far between...

>>43822433
I understand that, and I hate it. I really wish sometimes there was no genders. Or we were at least like the evolved form of the humans in Aeon Flux. The name of the episode leaves me right now, but I hope you know what i'm talking about.

These girls must be smart... they know how to utilize the internet for more than just Myspace.

>>43822507
No gender? That means everyone's fair game for rape! Oh shi-!

>>43822584
Last I checked, men could be raped by women using tools.

>>43822418
True, but like any male, there is a limit on how much a person can take. No one can be the ultimate definition of indifferent, and no one can be 100% empathetic.

>>43822584
Teh womenz already rape men! It's called a strap on.

Oh shi...

Your fortune: Good Luck

>>43822350

I know thats they only kinda girl u can get so I can see how u would think she is hot.
>>43822279
see above. its prolly a pic of u. cunt.

>>43822262

all u can attack is my internet grammar? ur so full of fail. how does it feel to have a small dick? I would flash my sweet tits in ur acne-filled face to make u cry.

>>43822108
The reason why sitcoms and commercials often feature dumb men and smart women is because your average woman responds well to that setup. Nobody in this thread seems to be disputing the assertion that "average" women are dumb bitches that like to shop; they're a lucrative target demographic, so you see this trend in advertising a lot.

moar charts

>>43822056
>Why must you hate that which you don't understand?

i didnt see any hate in op's post

Women have an unfair advantage, they can distract us with some kind of secret weapons.

>>43822692
You know me so well.

>>43822774
The coldest eyes imaginable? I can't look away. She's stealing my soul!

enjoy being in the lowest caste ya douche

>>43822670
I'm sorry that you feel that way about someone you've never even seen. You have my sympathy. Anyone can be that judgmental must be pretty impaired when it comes to the intelligence department. Life must be pretty difficult when you go home to one of your many men crying that they've never loved you. When will you realize that you're wrong?

>>43822670
Katey? Didn't I beat you enough when we went out?

Is it just me, or is the Y axis incorrect, it should be number of people, not their inteligence.

Also , back to kitchen.

>>43822674
Indeed.

The easiest demographic to advertise to are the lowest common denominator that doesn't know any better. Therefore stupid people in general are advertised to.

>>43822774
bullshit. That thinking is the reason men are viewed as weak minded pigs. Rule your fucking life, don't be a slave to your dick.

>>43823021
EXACTLY!

YOU HAVE PORN FOR THAT ALREADY!

>>43822670

wow this is either the dumbest trap(no girls on internet) ever, or the best troll ever.

highly relevant

>>43823021
Oooh. Got ya.

1.)GB2/School
2.)Get badass job
3.)Hire a "personal assistant"
4.)?????
5.)PROFIT!

>>43822674
OP here.

Yes, but it SHOULD NOT BE THE TREND! Way back when, it was the trend that racist Black (and I use the term black, because I'm not just talking about African Americans, but Africans, as well) jokes were awesome, but you don't see very many of those said by white folk anymore, do you?

Men should not be the butt of every joke. Neither should women. They should be equal. It's fine for stupid men to be made fun of, but it should ALSO be fine for stupid women to be made fun of, just the same.

Men need to start complaining. It might just surprise the women.

>>43823182
It's pretty much the opposite now, the white male is the most discriminated group in the U.S. today.

I don't think that "line for line" bit would work too well though.

>>43823162
I see now! It all makes sense.

Hmmmm. I have a decent IQ of 130-135 depending on the test i take. RL test.

Last time i was tested was 8th grade.

I'm shitty at things when i first start, but once i focus at something for a week or two i begin to surpass the others around me.

Was best at geometry and spatial skills. Might go into Engineering or Architecture. Or marine officer.

I've noticed most girls are average intelligence.


Got gifted in the looks department too. Most girls say I have a 8/10 face or so. However I am shit in the social department. Probably because i didn't become attractive until 17 when my face became more defined and i lost acne/braces. so i never learned.

I use to think i didn't get along with most girls since i was a bit smarter, but that's not the case. Just realized I suck at interacting. I thought about a "smart girl" and realized i wouldn't want that either. I just prefer to be alone and am not good with others. Not a people person or interesting to most with my limited interest.

Hate to sound like a clique fag but im around the same introversion of House, a bit less outspoken but give it a few years and i'll feel comfortable to be that much of a prick. Was always one of those people others came to for advice in school because i as usually right.

I don't know if most intelligent people prefer to keep to them selves or if that is not the case. I never feel the need (save the internet) to interact much. Can deal with my problems by myself usually. Share with /b/ sometimes but meh that's more of a way to kill time. never did before i found /b/ and was the same.

>>43823314
All of the racism and discrimination against White Men has proven that White Men are no worse than anyone else, but more importantly that no minority, sex, or anybody else is any BETTER than White Men!

When it comes right down to it, we are all humans. We need to, as a society, understand this.

Good luck making the "elite" give up their dumb kids and send them to menial labor

>>43823182
Agreed. One of the many problems of society today is that people are too scared to insult other people because of prejudice laws. They don't want to get in trouble. It's pretty sickening.

>>43823438
Hopefully those smart enough to be considered elite will also be rational enough to know that some sacrifices must be made for the good of the cause.

>>43818293

And what would you say if a person consistantly hit say 186, on every test you gave them?

>>43818404
An entire language in one day? Thats a pretty fucking stupid claim.
First off, that would be insane memory abilities, which does not equal intelligence, and secondly I highly doubt anyone could do that anyway.

>>43823405
tl;dr = Womenz are people too? Smart people are recluses.

>>43823506
That they memorized their answers, unless you gave them several different tests...

Your fortune: You will meet a dark handsome stranger

>>43823500

just because they're smart doesn't mean they're totalitarians or communists. Infact they're more likely NOT to be.

>>43823405
You appear to be "Exception that proves rule"

>>43823519
You're... ... ... slow...

Use Google.

>>43823405
no one cares

Both axes of your graph have intelligence on them. OH THE IRONY.

>>43823500
HAHAHAHAHABLLBLLAF`WEHU)=¤("!¤?)"

Fuck you and your Tau shit

"Intelligence is adaption to the environment." Basically how fast you absorb knowledge.

I've noticed in early years the average girl is smarter than the average guy. In public school at least.

When we grow older it seems men seem to be more intelligent.

Just based on personal observation have nothing to back it up.

Girl here. I kind of agree with the OP. I don't think that women should be put on a pedestal just because we're women. We're not better for any reason. We might be better at certain things, but that goes both ways.

>>43823718
That's because the smarter you are, the smarter you are.

More men are Engineers and have technical jobs than women because most with an IQ above 120 are men and those jobs require skill.

>>43823884
Sorry name one work field of work that doesn't involve using your body to gain an advantage that women surpass men at?

Oh wait...

>>43823884
Ehehehehe! She said "goes both ways"!!! Hey guyz look im posting on teh intanets!

>>43823405
Actually, I think that describes most of /b/, guys or girls, heh.

I'd say around the same for myself, I was labeled as gifted as well but I've always had problems with social interaction. I actually started with pretty poor motor skills when I was young, but that balanced out over time. I've personally always had great logical reasoning ability and I've always been quite adept to mathematics and computer science. In general, most intelligent people don't seek out mass social interaction that's meaningless, because they don't need it. Because of that, anyone with intelligence usually just keeps to themselves either way.

>>43823877
In elementary school, women were also stronger, taller, and faster, if I recall.

Things change as we all mature. Women also mature much earlier than men do, but that really wouldn't apply to elementary school... hmm...

>>43823884
A quote from another forum:

The correct answer to the question "Who's better, men or women ?" is "Unanswerable; define your terms". Men are stronger, women more flexible. Men are heat resistant, women cold resistant. Women have a longer lifepan, men stronger joints. Women have a stronger immune system, men a more tolerent one ( less prone to allergies and autoimmune disorders, more vulnerable to parasites and disease ). Men are better at mathematics and ballistics, women at social skills and color discrimination. Men can't get pregnant/don't need to worry about it, women can bear children/need to worry about pregnancy. Men are more prone to produce geniuses, women less prone to mental retardation and insanity. Which is more desirable ? Lacking a Standard Reference Human, there's no way to judge.

>>43823970
I would like to personally thank you for not saying that you have Asperger's syndrome.

>>43823970
No. I'm smart but ugly. And i wish i was around people but noone likes me :(

>>43823965
Could you repeat the question but word it differently so I can understand what you're asking?

>>43824061
Name one field of work that involves intelligence, not manager shit, that women excel over men at.

Writing Harry Potter books.

>>43823983
Fun fact: Newborn neanderthals were more developed than newborn homo sapiens. They also matured more quickly. A mature homo sapiens is, however, markedly more intelligent than any mature neanderthal was.

>>43824016
Please wait while we deliver your "Standard Reference Human" shipping time is estimated at 3-5 days.

True, that.

>>43824036
I'm puzzled by the recent trendiness of self-diagnosed Asperger's. When I first heard about Asperger's, I read the symptoms, and concluded that I'm just a spazz.

>>43824096
Dude, I have no idea... why are you asking me? I'm going into marine sciences and wear a low cut shirt to work to get bigger tips. I doubt that will work later on in life when trying to build my career, but I also won't be working for tips.

>>43824159
I imagine it's a matter of survival. You can't have little re re cave men running around, they'd get eated up by dinosaurs and shit. I know this because the earth is only 5000 years old.

Fun Fact: Penguins have an organ behind their eyes that converts sea water to fresh water.

>>43824332
i srsly lol'd

>>43824096
Child care. Women are generally more adept at non-verbal communication, and are therefore generally better at ascertaining whether an infant needs to be changed or fed or whatnot.

>>43824159
But our bodies right now are 10,000 years behind our civilization. Our bodies are privative. It still runs like a hunter-gatherer type.

>>43824399
Do babies recycle? I mean, their food gets expensive, cant he just like, reuse it?

>>43824399
Lol...

>>43824297
Only an idiot would say they have it unless they are TERRIBLY AWKWARD that they cannot speak in a professional manner even. Most people can understand sarcasm and know when people are teasing. They just can't respond to it well.

An assburger would not be able to tell at all.

However, all of us highly introverted people probably do have the Schizoid personality type. Google for info. not a disorder, but not the best thing to have.

>>43824036 (same poster)
Funny that you mention that. I once went to a psychiatrist for problems with sleep deprivation. But once I got telling her my problems, she changed the subject and wanted to say that I had Asperger's because I fell into a wide range of possibilities and "sounded" like I could have it. Even though Asperger's has nothing to do with severe insomnia in the least. After that, my parents wanted to blame shit on it because they thought it was a real diagnosis, and I was forced to believe it for a while. Of course I know that's bullshit looking back on it. People want an easy thing to blame to get more money out of people, primarily. If it sounds like it, then you have a diagnosis. Most intelligent people can easily figure that this is in fact bullshit.

Something I've observed for a while is that it's the nature of most intelligent people not to care about a mass amount of social interaction, and keep to the people and things that matter to them. That's what is logical. You'll see it a billion times on places like /b/, the exact same story told through thousands of different voices. It's just the nature of us, not a problem. Thinking logically isn't actually as common with people that we're lead to believe.

>>43817746

People have thought of this shit before, bad idea

>>43824332
Yeah, too bad neanderthals never figured out the javelin. Fossil evidence shows that male neanderthals had a very high incidence of injuries that modern-day cowboys get. They tended to run up to their prey and stab it with spears, while homo sapiens threw their spears from a safe distance.

>>43824496
People make so many mental diseases and personality disorders is because they want an excuse to have whenever they act up. They need something to blame their inappropriate behavior on. Also because it gives us another way to group together different people with the same disorders. "This way acts this certain way, I totally understand that!"

>>43824530
Pics or it didn't happen!

>>43824631
Aye.

Funny thing is that Asperger's isn't even an officially recognized syndrome because it hasn't even been completely proven.

>>43824440
Actually, most races of humans have evolved significantly over the course of the last ten thousand years. White people are relatively disease-resistant. Generation upon generation of living in squalid cities, as well as plague after plague, has weeded out the white people who aren't disease-resistant. The native american tribes, by contrast, had not lived in squalid cities, and their nomadic lifestlye was not conducive to the spreading of plagues. When white people came to the americas, the native hunter-gatherer populations were decimated by diseases that white people could cope with.

ITT: Males are still the dominant gender to the horror of all feminists. Also no girls on the interwebz.

I've decided that I have Aspergers, because I feel like being an asshole in public, instead of just on the internet.

>>43824902
I wouldn't call myself dominant exactly.

OP's graph:

300000 hours in MSPaint

If it were true, graph only shows distribution of intelligence - from this graph you cannot tell if the smartest individual is male or female.

All it shows is that smart males outnumber smart females, which is the conclusion you might draw from looking at attendance on maths or physics courses at universities. Or, to put it another way, OP probably pulled this out of his arse.

Go read some Huxley. You'll enjoy Brave New World, there's some good fapping material near the end.

>>43819591
>>43821509

Thank you, both of you. Best posts in this thread. I was getting all pissed off because the op graphed intelligence against intelligence.

>>43817715
>>43817746


It's like you're saying what I've been thinking all these years.

Now onto the subject of how whites are smarter than blacks.

>>43825039
OPs graph could be fixed if somebody'd write "groups" on the X Axis, and "Level of intelligence" on the Y.

the Glass Ceiling phenomenon exists because powerful men think like OP

OP is cause, not solution

I think it's very amusing how people seem to think that OP is pretending his graph is serious business.

>>43824898
Then explain to my why whenever we see or smell food (whether it be in front of our faces or on the television screen, we apparently don't know the difference.) our body stores all of the glucose in our system into fat immediately so we have low blood sugar, and our hypothalamus picks up on it and makes us hungry, even if we are not hungry? It's a hunter-gatherer trait. It knows that food might not always be available (even though it may be) so it stores it to make you hungry, so when the time would've came you were eventually hungry and there was no food, that would never happen.
Also, when we're up at night, our bodies believe that we're up scavenging for food, when all we may be doing is reading a book or on the computer. It might also think something's wrong and starve you to give you motivation to be leaving. Because the only reason you're up late is because of danger.

I know there's more, but I can't remember. That lecture on it was weeks ago, i've slept since then.

>>43825111
Right, onto minorities.

If it wasn't for the blacks and Mexicans males would totally dominate in all spectrums.

>>43825039
Huxley is amazing. This topic actually made me go drag out Brave New World and Brave New World: Revisited.

I'm sorry men and women are not equal in terms of intelligence like you'd all like to believe.

Most of the smarter people are men. And that's all that matters since people of average intelligence don't make the big breakthroughs.

That line graphs showing the intelligence is equal is wrong.

>>43821439
OH MY GOD. Please go die. You just made every girl in here ashamed to admit their gender.

OP here! This will be my last post in this thread.

>>43825189 wins the thread.

I just wanted to see how long it'd take for somebody to say something along these lines. I can go to sleep now. It's like... 3 AM.

/b/ you have restored my faith in humanity. This was a very entertaining evening. Thank you.

>>43817715
FUCK YOU ASSHOLE.
WOMEN BELIEVE BEAUTY ADVERTS
AND 80% OF MEN ARE ABOVE AVERAGE INTELLIGENCE.

>>43825320
>>43825402

Oh Slowpoke! When did you get here?

>>43817746

Hyeneas have alpha females

>>43825489
80%? You made that up.

>>43825500

lol win.

>>43825610
People lying? ON THE INTERNET!?

>>43825610

Obviosuly he did idiot.
80%, above average. Does that work?

>>43825500
I wrote >>43825402 but not the other. Sorry

Wut?

>>43817715
The vast majority of men are fucking stupid. The vast majority of women are downs-syndrome stupid

>>43825637
NEVAR!!

>>43825717
^failed abortion

>>43825489
ugh.

>>43825209
Because natural selection selects for reproduction, not longevity. The problems caused by our metabolic foibles tend to manifest in middle age, well after our prime reproductive years. If these foibles would seriously compromise one's health earlier in life, *then* natural selection would weed them out.

P.S.
Don't enter your fucking email address. It makes you look like a douche.

>>43825801
How does it make me a douche?
And for your explanation, touché.

Anyone who claims they are intelligent is just a fucking idiot.

>>43825717
Correction: The vast majority of men are of mediocre intelligence. An even vaster majority of women are of mediocre intelligence.

I think this thread should be archived, for future idiots to be told. Who's with me?

This thread went downhill as soon as OP declared a winrar...

Good timing, OP. Good timing.

>>43825948
Second.

Oookay, this seems like a good time to employ some common sense.

While I do agree that idiots shouldn't be allowed to vote or take part in politics we cannot have a system where superiority is based entirely on some arbitrary test (yes, IQ-tests are arbitrary, a high IQ means only that you can do the test well). I realize you amerifags already do that what with SATs and all, but at least it isn't used to determine your worth as a human being.
I'm a fairly smart guy myself. I got into Mensa easily enough, three days of reading got me into a university, have done fairly well in math competitions and so forth. But that doesn't make me a part of any elite. I completely suck at many things, up to and including handling daily life. Sure, I can do university math while in the shower, sure, I discuss theoretical physics during lunch, but I'll be damned if I could organize anything. There's plenty of people that are arguably "dumber" than me but do a lot of stuff better than I do. These people are not the problem. It's the real idiots. The ones who keep voting for war-mongers and can't read without moving their lips. No thank you.

And as for the IQ itself, citing all those numbers is absolutely pointless unless you also give the distribution as well (distribution is used in the formula to translate percentages into IQs. E.g. I have an IQ of 170, using distribution of 24, that means I did better at the test than 99,5% of the population (probably less but that's just because the test hasn't been calibrated in at least 100 years). Using distribution of 12 my IQ is only about 140-ish. So there.)
And historical figures probably haven't done the same IQ-test as the rest of us schmucks, so their IQs are only estimates (made by their publicists, no doubt).

>>43825881
Entering your email smacks of namefaggotry. Anon does not like namefags, especially during periods of forced anon.

RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE

>>43825922
He that humbleth himself wishes to be exalted.
--Nietzsche

It seems the pendulum has swung too far.

>>43826066
Gordon Freeman?

>>43826206
Utterly rules.

>>43826206
Naw, Gordon Freeman is leaner, meaner and doesn't fap as much as I.

Please, ladies and gentlemen. I do believe we would be better off without this argument. There is nothing we can do to improve the situation, it is merely a fact of life. I must run now, I have some volunteer work to do at the nursing home for mentally retarded senior citizens. I hope you think my words over carefully. Have a pleasant day!

--The Black People

>>43826365
Fuck you, nigger.

-The White People

>>43826066
Indeed, IQ tests are pretty much bullshit. So far, we've just let the free market handle things. Positions of power and authority tend to go to the most capable, so the most capable tend to be the ones that get things done.

>>43826511
Fuck you, cracka.

>>43826365
No, niggers would be better off without this argument. The discussion this thread affirms that white men (and to a lesser extend white women) tend to be the most able to excel in civilized society.

>>43826576
The only problem is that in today's politics power doesn't go to the most capable, rather to the one most able to manipulate the public. G.W. anyone?

>>43826609
"White folks was in caves while we was building empires ... We taught philosophy and astrology and mathematics before Socrates and them Greek homos ever got around to it."
--Al Sharpton

LOL niggers had a head start and still failed so fucking miserably. Also, l2grammar, Sharpton.

I approve of this thread!

>>43826841
How do I MASSIVE FUCKING FAILED saying?

>>43817715
MORON

Y axis=intelligence
X axis=....intelligence???
FAK U

Must... let... thread... DIE!

>>43826841
Dubya ain't in a true position of power or authority. He's in public office, and beholden to campaign donors and so forth. It's the campaign donors etc. that wield true power and sway public opinion. I never said that these Powers That Be are benevolent, but at least they aren't communists.

>>43827057
Why good sir, you must be a woman to whine of such petty matters. It shows a simply appalling weakness of character, it does indeed.

>>43827210
OP's graph = trap

stay put for next time`s lesson in /b/
how to draw your own statistic to prove shit your silly mind just made up

>>43826966
Ai yai yai! Dientes del burro!

>I never said that these Powers That Be are benevolent, but at least they aren't communists.

POORLY EDUCATED AMERICAN SPOTTED

>>43827197
Ah well, forgive my foolish optimism. I allowed myself to believe, for a moment, that american presidency could not be bought or bartered. Apparently I was wrong.

But wait!
Did he not declare some wars somewhere? DAMN IT, did the bomb industry buy your president?

OP, if there were a word that could communicate how retarded you are, you probably wouldn't be able to use it in a sentence. You definitely would not be able to use it in a graph. In short, you fail at not being retarded. You're dumber than a woman.

My word /b/! I've made a startling discovery!

>>43827197
Dubya doesn't have any campaign donors, you retard. He can't even be elected again.

why is learning a language a signal of intelligence? A really fucking good memory yes, but intelligence is your calculating and reasoning side

>OP, if there were a word that could communicate how retarded you are, you probably wouldn't be able to use it in a sentence. You definitely would not be able to use it in a graph. In short, you fail at not being retarded. You're dumber than a woman.

c+

>>43827586
Reasoning maybe, calculating is not a sign of intelligence. Unless you think calculators are intelligent.

>>43827287
Yes I know. The graph is complete fiction. Coincidentally, the main point of his argument happens to be true. It's more common for men to have IQs near the edges of the bell graph than for women. It isn't something to brag about though. High IQ usually has a cost.

>>43826066
Yes that's me.

>>43827620
Since actual professional experts still haven't come up with a good, universal and practical definition for "intelligence", I wish you good luck.

My personal favorite is defining intelligence as ability to respond to change (in other words, learning)

Here's the argument, won in no time.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkMkGOpAF4s

>>43827776
My definition of intelligence is much more practical -- the ability to distinguish truth from falsity.

>>43827974

That's street smarts I think.

>>43827374
Naw, I ain't american. I simply believe that communism is a flawed and inferior economic model. Oh, and don't go clarifying that you mean Marxism; it's unimplementable. While many proles may think that they'd be better off under a communist system, this simply isn't the case. Fortunately, the Powers That Be are by and large wealthy businessmen, and have no illusions that communism would benefit them or society as a whole. They have the wealth and influence to sway public opinion away from wrong-minded socialist thinking. Thus, we have the stability of a democracy (or illusion thereof) without the danger of public policy actually being set by the lowest common denominator.

>>43827974
Ah but it isn't universal, it depends on both the tester and the testee. If the tester happens to be an exceptional liar the result would be affected.

This thread is now about nakedness!

it's funny how everyone is proud of their intelligence in this thread - and nothing wrong with that, or showing off what you've got - but whenever mensa is brought up on /b/, anon becomes an angry creature

reminds me of that copypasta about white men. spiteful about blacks for not being as productive as them, spiteful about jews for being more productive

>>43828122
SECOND!

>>43828122
>>43828074
Tit's and communism. There's only one thing to be done now.

<- LOOK AT THE FUCKING PICTURE

Thread over.

>>43828034
Street smarts is a term that dumb people use to comfort themselves.

I prefer to make people guess my intelligence whenever I can. It makes for some pretty good lulz. Also, standardized tests are flawed by default. Anyone with an ounce of common sense can see this.

>>43828289

This thread is now officially perfect.

>>43828362

All that's missing now is mootle banning all participants.

>>43828122
what the fuck happened to the nipples?!?!? a reverse vacuum?

>>43822114
>There are few female executives because there are relatively few women fit for executive jobs. Meanwhile, we see many female cashiers because it ain't that hard to learn how to work a till.

by the second sentence, you're implying in the first that being an executive is a matter of skill/intelligence. women are (generally) less inclined to give a shit about controlling other people, and (generally) have less nerve for it anyway

that lesbian Pink is just as bad, in one of her videos where she's like "WHERE'S THE FEMALE PRESIDENT"

>>43828362
[X] Sexism
[X] Racism
[X] Flames
[X] Faux-intellectual debates
[X] A few good points
[X] Argument over communism
[X] Tits
[X] Dubya-bashing
[X] Trolling
[X] Discussion of hyena genitalia
[X] Mockery of retards
[X] Mockery of asperger's syndrome
[X] Discussion of natural selection
[X] Image macro of a cat

By the gods, you're right! It's the perfect /b/ thread!

>>43828251
A little confidence and pride never hurt anyone, as long as it's not overly egotistical.

>>43828744
The ability and inclination to manipulate other people is a fundamental part of being an influential person.

Is this not because women have smaller brains than men? duh..

>>43828769
My God... you're right... WHAT HAS SCIENCE DONE!?

Jesus raptor christ, ARCHIVE THIS SHIT!

>>43828769
It's like the essence of /b/, distilled and mixed with powdered viagra.

>>43828769

You forgot one thing.

Pic highly related.

>>43828967

>>43829103
Ohhh, it looks like he has 2 buttholes, right?

>>43829103
Wedding ring?

>>43829202
>>43829215

Protip: Open in winrar for double teh lulz.

Archive this!

only one thing to do, destroy all humans

>>43829024
How do I archived thread?

>>43829335
I'll get the lazer, one sec.

>>43829103
What the fuck is that????

Your fortune: Average Luck

must post in epic thread.

Win thread is win.

Notice how it wasn't cluttered up by spam. Thanks, Mootle!

How to: Create an epic thread.

It's official: The debate is over. Let's just post awesome things and bask in the win of this thread.

>>43829492

A suitcase... packed full of tasty meetz.

>>43829492

It's fucking laser from Abe's eyes, fool!

>>43829602
NO SAGE-FAGS, EITHER. I'M BILLY MAYS, AND I APPROVE THIS THREAD.

IF WOMEN ARE SO SMART, WHY DO SO MANY OF THEM GO INTO PORN MOTHERFUCKER!?

>>43829756
It's official...

>>43829779
Abe knows how to deal with womenfolk.

this thread is gayzor

I think this is the only true case of /thread over that I've ever seen.

men are brutal, women just use tha word!

fighting seems stupid to womankin so they think they are superior to us when we could beat the crab out of them in matematics and shit like that... who need literal or artistic intelligence anyways? nothin good was created that way... only rights to gay men (why people seem to think that gay men are bad but lesbians are awwwright, I do not know) and furry is done mostly by women. Time=money woman=time+money = woman=evil

Holy shit! This thread is over four hours old!

We get this shit archived yet?

>>43829602
Methinks the chemotherapy is working.

>>43830075
and spelling?

Too bad OP left. Thread got Epic.

>>43830075
Example of the variety that the male end of the species has.

The retarded, the normal, and the geniuses.

You can guess which this man is.

The normal? *siiiigh*

>>43830075

I gots me 133 IQ am I smurft?

Statistically yes.

>>43830075
>>43830605
Same person.

>>43831032
but you're on /b/, so probably not

>>43831108
nope, sorry, please try again

>>43829816
because the men can't do anything on their own?

>>43831032

Horray! Thread archived for great justice!

>>43831032

MINZ OVAR 9000!!!!1!!!

Wow, nice thread, too bad I missed most of it...

The problem with all this is that no one will admit he or she is as dumb as they really are.

We all cling to the notion that we are the smartest people around where ever we hang out.

The dumbest will usually maintain that their demographic group is the smartest. That usually leads into eugenics.

The really smart ones stay well away from /b/ and all those spurious arguments.

tl, dr: I am just as dumb as all of you other nitwits.

>>43832011
NO U!!!!!!

lol best line ever

>>43832011
Everyone knows that everyone on /b/ is a weeaboo trolling to be a retarded monkey for the lulz.

>>43832808

Bad shoop is bad

if they so smart how cum dey can't cook a decent meal without givin us lip? derrrrr

>>43833077
Oh snap you sure told them!

>>43817746
The majority more so refers to the people in POWER, therefore men ARE THE MAJORITY, good job not taking highschool level sociology, moron.

>>43834086
Indeed

that graph doesn't even make sense.
it's saying that "stupid as hell" women are more intelligent than stupid as hell men, medium women are more intelligent than medium men and very smart men are more intelligent than very smart women.
ler 2 label n00b.

Your fortune: Godly Luck

Copypasta is copypasta.

But it's really good copypasta.

>>43835892
Not the copypasta that counts, but the replies.

Classic shit right here.

Your fortune: Better not tell you now

better graph

>>43836405
enjoy ur mediocrity

Your fortune: Reply hazy, try again

>>43821576
I like your graph. The colors really made what you were trying to say clear. XD. Though I must ask...do you have parkinson's disease. And, I don't want to hear that it was because you were using ms paint, because I can draw perfect circles, in paint, with ease. XD

Your fortune: Reply hazy, try again

>>43836405
you didn't label your y-axis and your comas are all fucked. But, yes the graph looks like it wasn't done by a 7yr old...or, a woman.

>>43836842
Fun fact: It was made by a 7 year old woman.

Your fortune: Good Luck

>>43836842
those are eurofag commas

>>43817746
>>43817715

They speak words of wisdom, harken to them!

poasting in possible epic thread